Sunday, February 15, 2009

Octuplet Rage and Foster Care

I'm not interested in attacking or defending the woman who had octuplets. I still don't fully comprehend why she's getting so much attention. I'm beginning to work it out, and the reasons are ugly.

As someone who's going through fertility treatments (albeit pretty mild ones) I know a fair amount about reproductive technology and about what having octuplets involves. It's scary. I would never get into that situation. If I even got CLOSE to that situation, I would hit the big red flashing ABORT button.

I think she made a pretty bad decision. I also think her doctor is unethical and the ART field should be more regulated, much like it is in Europe.

But in a larger context, people make bad decisions all the time... much worse decisions than she's made. There are men who go around creating babies like freaking lawn sprinklers without feeling the slightest sense of responsibility. These men don't end up all over the news. They don't get anonymous death threats because they're "wasting taxpayer money."

The hatred for her is way out of proportion. An article at Racialicious looks at the racial angle, and there definitely is a connection, because some of the vitriol ties into anti-immigrant sentiment. Ultimately, I think it's more like 60% sexism and 30% class and 10% race. She's become the archetypal "bad mother," a scapegoat for societal fear and loathing about women.

I just don't see what she's done to deserve all this rage. One criticism is that she's "stealing from taxpayers". What about all the bailed-out executives who got billions in bonuses? Her media rights will probably be enough cover medical expenses anyway, and even if they're not, any added tax burden is dwarfed by other more successful, less hated thieves.

The most disturbing part is the dehumanizing language toward her children, with so many people calling them a "litter". Whatever you've judged that she's done, they're little babies. Sins of the mother? Come on.

I wasn't going to post anything, but Torina just put up a rant, and I have to chime in and say that I feel much the same way. Apparently some of the commenters on this case are even saying that her babies should be taken away, which is ridiculous.

I CARE. I care about every kid out there. But those octuplet babies are STILL BEING TAKEN CARE OF. Let's worry about the KIDS THAT ARE NOT BEING TAKEN CARE OF. HELLOOOO!!!! They are all around us! There are 650 kids waiting in to be adopted from foster care in Minnesota RIGHT NOW. If you care about children, what about these kids???

Kids are removed because their parents NEGLECTED THEM, BEAT THEM, SEXUALLY ABUSED THEM. Not because their mom had too many eggs implanted by some idiot doctor. Let's start caring about the kids we already KNOW need us. These octuplet kids, as hare-brained as their mom might be, she hasn't hurt them or done anything criminal yet. So let's move on to the kids who really need us.


And to address another type of comment on this case -- as I've said here before, using children in foster care to condemn parenting choices you don't like can be really exploitative. "The octuplets' mother should have adopted from foster care" -- I don't think so. She sounds way too immature to handle that. I'm adopting from foster care, and I don't go around using my choice as some kind of self-righteous bludgeon, because that's not fair to anyone, including my son. Whenever anyone says "X should have adopted a waiting child instead of Y" I always wonder, have they put their money where their mouth is, have they themselves been through foster care, or have they been involved extensively in some other way? And if none of those things are true, they probably need to shut the hell up, because they're just exploiting the existence of waiting children without helping the situation at all.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hmmm this is a tricky one to comment on. I believe that anyone can have as many children as they want as long as they have the ability to take care of them.

What is bugging me and many of my friends though is the fact that this lady, on government assistance (food stamps and wic) has had fertility treatments done to concieve every single one of her children. Fertility treatments aren't cheap... How is she affording them if she is still qualifying for government assistance?

Angel The Alien said...

I agree with you... the lady with her fourteen kids may not have much common sense, but she's not really committing a huge crome against society by having too many kids. Its her thing to deal with, and she may or may not need help, but we should just leave her be. There are definitely bigger problems we should be dealing with, kids who really do need help RIGHT NOW!

Jessica Rhee said...

Hi, I'm a little late in reading/commenting, but I just found your blog (great job btw!!)

What interested me about suleman's story is that the embryos implanted (6 i believe, of which two split and hence created 8 total) were from a previous IVF treatment, not created specifically for the treatment that led to her octuplets.

It is interesting to me that this angle has been virtually ignored. The question I would love to pose to all those who have hopped onto the hate-wagon is whether they feel they have the right to decide what happens to embryos that would otherwise sit in limbo into perpetuity. I think the uproar over suleman may have deep implications for where we as a nation are towards our feelings on abortion and how we view embryos. if the criticism is for carrying 8 embryos, is abortion/selective reduction then implicitly morally permissible? Does society get to dictate how individuals handle embryos, and who gets the right to have children (and how many)? I seriously hope someone can do an in-depth analysis of this.