Tuesday, October 20, 2009

BB and Sunny Update

I haven't posted in a while. I just haven't felt up to long-form writing.

I finally spoke to BB's adoption caseworker... this is the same woman who was also Sunny's caseworker. I got a bit emotional on the phone with her and told her that this process was very hard on everyone, especially Sunny, who often asks us when he's going to be a big brother. I told her I was totally aware of the budget crisis, and that I was also aware that BB's case plan had moved to adoption many months ago, though we had no communication from the state about it. I asked her if things would be easier if BB went to his grandmother (NN) and then we adopted him from her in a private adoption (NN had raised this idea herself a while back). I even asked her if it would make things easier if we hired a lawyer... I added that I didn't mean this in any antagonistic sense, but was posing it as a sincere question.

She didn't have a lot of answers for me, and she didn't have good news either. Things have changed since they did the contract to place Sunny with us; because of the budget crisis, it's even harder for their state to work with private agencies like ours. If they don't have budget approval to do the contract with the agency, our agency would have to transfer our homestudy to Dekalb County and have them do placement and post-placement supervision. That would present another roadblock and potential area for delays.

We'll find out in the next few days whether this county transfer has to happen or not. BB has been in limbo for 14 months already.

At this point, if the ball ever gets rolling, they'll also determine subsidy information if he's special needs. I'm sure that by now he really is "special needs" according to the state definition. For those who aren't familiar with foster adoption terminology, special needs doesn't necessarily involve any defined mental or physical handicap. Special needs really just means "it's harder to find adoptive parents for this child than it would be for a healthy white infant". There are almost no general adoptions that aren't "special needs" according to some definition.

But BB might have real special needs. His foster mom says she's a bit worried that he can't use the fingers on the right side of his body to grasp things. He still grasps using only his entire right fist. Since she's raised double digits of bio and foster kids over several decades I trust her opinion on his development. And she believes he's behind, though not so behind that needs physical therapy... yet.

The longer he stays with her the more difficult his transition is going to be. It's tough at any stage, but some stages are probably worse. A toddler is more aware of different people than an infant, but they're not able to express the emotions they're feeling, like Sunny was when he came to us at the age of 6.

We're going there for Halloween -- just Sunny and I -- so I'll get a chance to see BB. This quick weekend visit is a big treat for Sunny, because he loves talking about how much fun the great big foster family has doing Halloween stuff together. However, the visit also represents a major break in structure, and that's had some negative effects. He had more fits, got mad on several occasions because I wasn't letting him do things that his foster mom let him do (and he almost never uses that complaint), has been especially needy, and regressed in terms of what he wants to watch and read. He's been watching Dora cartoons that are way below his level, but they're obviously comforting him, so we don't discourage that.

I'm a big believer in openness, and I don't think the visit itself is having these negative effects. Instead, it's the break in structure. If we had already established a clear schedule of exactly when we would visit his family, this wouldn't be as much of an issue. I think in the future we'll have to establish a single date and stick to it on a yearly basis. I can't afford much more than that... each visit means at least two plane tickets, a hotel room and a rental car.

Sunny has had some rough episodes recently, but this weekend, we also had some wonderful times with him. On Sunday, we went walking on the trails at the Chattahoochee Nature Center, and Guy taught Sunny how to skip stones into the beaver pond. Later that day, when they were driving together, Sunny wrote Guy a note:

"You are the best dad I love you and I will love you forever"

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Dark Sarcasm in Adoption

Guy recently reminded me of a conversation he had last year, when he was proudly telling his friends and colleagues about Sunny's placement with us.  I wasn't with him at the time.

One colleague gave him the standard "which country?" question, assuming international adoption. We both have the same attitude about that question: answer with a single direct sentence, ignore any looks of resulting embarrassment and just move on with the conversation.  So Guy told his colleague we were adopting from Sunny's home state.

The colleague responded, "Well, you didn't have to adopt from a third-world country!"

This would have been horribly insulting... if his colleague hadn't been Chinese-American. So the joke was really on everyone. Guy thought it was hilarious, although we won't be repeating it with any sort of frequency.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Personal Update and Blog/Racialicious Comparison

Last week was really exhausting. I need another vacation! My weekends are becoming an extension of the working week... and this is mainly my own fault, since I really need to organize them better.

Sunny has a 101-degree fever this morning. Guy had to pick him up from school yesterday because he had a sore throat, but then his throat quickly got better, so Guy took him right back to school. Last night Sunny's appetite didn't suffer: he ate a huge pork chop, with sides of couscous and grilled asparagus with cheese on top, then some grapes for dessert. It's hard to know how to handle Sunny being sick because 1) he's ridiculously healthy and 2) he's sort of a hypochondriac. In all the time we've had him he's been sick exactly once, and that lasted less than a day. I think he has a very powerful immune system, so when gets sick, the symptoms are light, and go away quickly. Because he's so dramatic, he doesn't exactly lie, but he does exaggerate his symptoms greatly. All kids do this to some extent, but Sunny does seem a bit extreme. His friend J has a much more stoic approach to illness and injury. On the other hand, because Sunny's so energetic and restless, I think he gets up and moves around when he really should be relaxing...

I just hope he doesn't have the swine flu, or the regular flu, for that matter. I've been watching the news and calling our pediatrician to find out when I can get him the vaccine, but I don't have a date yet.

Right now, his cousin (Guy's sister's daughter) is visiting, and they're hanging out on the couch, watching Voltron and playing Legos together. They'd be out running around if Sunny was feeling better.

I just noticed comments from Sarah (hi!) saying, among other things, that I sound a lot different at this blog than I do at Racialicious, where I comment frequently and guest-post occasionally. I haven't thought about it that much, but that's right. I'm much more of a hard-ass at Racialicious, ha ha! It's a good jump-off point for talking about online communities in general, though.

I really don't like using terms such as "safe space" and "triggering" on the internet because I think they're infantilizing. But what I observe is sort of a continuum of environments. The parameters include the following:

1) Who are the members who will interact with you?
2) Who are the members who read what you say, but will not interact with you?
-- For anything posted publicly, 1) is unpredictable and 2) is REALLY unpredictable, and much larger than 1).
3) What's your degree of hard control over who will interact with you? If you're a moderator of a group, you can kick another member out. If you run a blog, you can delete comments. If you're on a forum, you could use the "ignore" feature on someone.
4) What's your degree of soft control (level of respect in you, or your peer group) when it comes to who will interact with you? If you tell someone they're being offensive, are they likely to listen to you and stop? Can you marshal support? If you have a whole posse of people and they all tell that person to stop, will they listen?
5) What is the range of opinions permissible in the environment? Is your perspective inside that range, outside that range or on the edge?
6) What do you want to get from the environment? Concrete bits of useful information? Psychological validation and a sense of human contact? Entertainment and light humor? Establishing lasting links with new people? Revenge? A sense of power over others? With these last two, we're getting into troll territory, although they're negative tendencies that can surface in absolutely anyone.
7) What do you want to give to the environment? Do you think you have anything of valuable to impart, and do you want to educate others? If so, you need to tailor your message to the audience (so we go back to 1 and 2).
8) What is the cost to you of participating in the environment? This is crucial. Navigating all these elements is hard. Just when you think you understand one of them, something changes. You get disappointed, angry, you feel like no one is listening to you, you thought you were in a "safe space" but someone attacks you, someone you thought was your ally disagrees with you strongly, you feel betrayed, you feel unwanted, you feel like you have to maintain a false face and hide your true self in order to gain acceptance, or you become disappointed in yourself because you engaged in negative behavior out of anger... internet drama takes a toll. Sometimes you want to be in an environment, but it's just too damaging, and you're better off turning your back. Sometimes the cost is very high, but what you're learning/getting is so valuable that you need to stay.

Though people will often say "I just want to express myself", it's never as simple as that. Unless your expression is totally private, "self-expression" will have a social element.

When it comes to 1) and 2) for this blog, I agonize a lot. I control my interactive audience by limiting comments to people with Google accounts. This means most of the people who interact here also have Google blogs. They're more invested in leaving substantive comments. So I almost never get drive-by comments. The trade-off is that I lose out on substantive comments by people who aren't registered and don't feel like registering. For 2), I removed this blog from Google listings for a while, then a few months ago I put it back on, and just now, I took it back off again. I do NOT want people who know me personally surfing in on key words. Especially my mom and dad. I'm very close to my mother. We work on certain projects together, we see each other every other day, but one of the reasons I don't talk about her much on this blog is that I don't want to put down key words that would lead her here, because she's internet-savvy and on more social media than I am! Partly because we're so close, I want to maintain certain barriers so I don't feel smothered. My dad is the opposite of my mom: he's an intensely private person. I am also protecting Sunny's identity and that of his biological and foster family. I have a lot of reasons to want to maintain anonymity.

My control over this blog isn't total, in the soft sense. I care about what other people think. The feelings of regular readers and commenters do factor when I'm writing a post. It's not the number one factor, but it's in there. Number 5 -- the range of permissible opinions -- is also difficult, because I'm blogging at the intersection of some practically incongruous communities. What's held as standard and inarguable inside one community might be totally outside the envelope at another. I flatter myself that in this respect, I'm quite honest, I don't censor myself and I don't avoid controversies. I put that opinion out there and I also analyze why it's outside the envelope to begin with. I've already talked a lot about what I've gotten from being part of a blog community (great, life-changing advice and support) and what I want to give back (more of the same). The emotional cost of running this blog mostly has to do with anonymity-agonizing... other than that, it's very low.

When it comes to Racialicious, all of these factors are different. A lot more people read there, and a lot more people read there that will never comment, but are still very important because what they read there might change their opinions. I don't have any hard control there, but I have a degree of soft control, because I've been hanging out there so long that I've built up respect. When it comes to the range of opinions, I'm mostly on the inside. So although there's a lot of tussling and heated debate that go on, the emotional cost to me is fairly low, because I feel like I'm arguing from a position of greater strength. Plus, there are a lot of posts on topics I have little experience on -- e.g. Native American identity, Islam -- and on those, I'm a member of the passive audience, learning but not necessarily interacting.

I used to participate in more online communities, but I don't have the time for a wide range. And when I analyze the emotional cost, it's often too high. There are a few communities I've participated in where I just wanted very concrete bits of information, in which I made sure to have a race- and gender-neutral handle, and got in and got out again right away. Because otherwise I would have been harassed and it would have been horrible. A few months ago I got burned when I was in a certain community and complained (in what I thought was a mild and reasonable way) about a racist Asian joke and about twenty members just piled on me. Race card, PC, no sense of humor, Asians are all doctors or lawyers anyway, blah blah blah. I walked around for a day in real life while fuming, and that wasn't healthy. Arguing a case in a hostile environment can do a lot of good (remembering, again, the passive audience) but it comes at a high emotional cost.

I don't think I'm really saying anything different at Racialicious, but I am talking about different aspects of the same things, and in different ways. I also let loose my evil sense of humor a bit more over there.

Update: by the time I finished typing this up, Sunny seems to have recovered... he's full of beans again, and playing some kind of high-volume racing game with his cousin.

Thursday, October 08, 2009

Geisha Blog Tiff

I've been twittering a fair amount lately. Here's a twitter-inspired microblogpost:

It's a Geisha blog tiff, not quite a war.

I'm glad to see that Jenn at Reappropriate is back to regular blogging, at least for now.

An Adoption Opinion I Totally Agree With

I just started reading this adoptive mother's blog (foster care plus adoption from international disruption). I don't find her adoption opinion to be controversial at all. It strikes me as simply practical! However, I realize it's a minority opinion among some strongly Christian-oriented communities, so I think it's great that she's linking her argument to Christian teaching.

I think adoption is best when there is no other option for a child's life. Like when the birthparents pose a death risk. Or when they are dead themselves. If adoption were not so glamorized, perhaps more young mothers who don't feel prepared and "selflessly" choose adoption so she "can move on with her life" would simply step up to the plate and become the person God created her to be. Perhaps their families would value supporting and helping the young/addicted/immature/etc. mother. The Bible is very clear: children are a blessing. All children. The world teaches the antithesis of that fact. People are being lied to. The Bible is also very clear that if God gives us a job to do, he will provide the strength and wisdom to do it. Where is the church today? Why is it so silent on this issue?

[...]

Where is God in this equation? Are we willing to decide for him that people will not change? In a lot of cases, neglect and verbal abuse are probably not worth adopting out a child. It doesn't matter how wonderful your home is.

The way I like to phrase it is that adoption should not be imagined as a method for moving a child from a Grade D or C family to a grade B or A family. It should be thought of more as a last-ditch resort for cases in which the original family is either dangerous, non-existent or completely unable to parent the child.

I'm absolutely horrified by Christian arguments that uphold adoption as some kind of wonderful, win-win solution to abortion. The proposed license plate below was recently held to be unconstitutional by Illinois, and I'm quite relieved about that.

From their website:


Adoption is a positive choice
The Donaldson Institute and the Dave Thomas Foundation performed a survey showing that Americans have a very favorable impression of adoption. 40% of Americans have considered adoption and 60% have been personally touched by adoption. The number of people seeking to adopt children makes every child a wanted child. Many people involved with adoption are supporting Choose Life plates.

I feel like waving my hands and screaming "NOT ME NOT ME NOT ME!"

And I wish I could make them change every instance of "child" in that paragraph to "healthy (preferably white) infant." There are layers upon layers of manipulation and exploitation at that site.

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

Adoption Disruption Unfolding

I feel really sorry for this family. Although this is an international adoption, I believe it could have happened -- and does happen fairly often -- with traumatized sibling groups adopted from foster care. Training and support help. But they're not magic shields.

I don't believe in saying "I won't judge". The word "judge" can mean many different things to different people... too often, I think it means a lack of critical analysis. For example, it's really sad for me to hear that the boy did not get therapy for so long because no one spoke his language. This is a problem, and it's connected to institutional issues, and more people need to be aware of it.

But I'm not going to "judge" in the sense of weighing moral worth. It sounds like the family is trying to do their best to keep their other children safe, while living up to their responsibility to their son.

I left some general advice, and I hope anyone else with any good advice or resources could leave a comment as well.

Family Needed

"Relationship Not Behavior" Advice

This seems like such a good piece of advice for older child adoption. I really encourage everyone to read the whole post if you haven't run across it already.

When I was a college administrator responsible for discipline I learned the concept, "Get them to respect you first, and later worry about them liking you." I took this principal into adoption and parenting and it ABSOLUTELY DID NOT WORK. Some of the kids never really came to love me as their mom and respect never came either.

Focus that first year on getting the kid to fall in love with you. If you do, you can worry about behavior. I'm not saying to ignore rule violations, but under-react. Keep the focus on the child, on attachment, on learning to understand your child and years down the road you'll be much farther ahead than those who started tackling behavior the day the kids moved in.

When it comes to Sunny's first year, I think we did some things right on purpose, and other things right purely on accident. But mostly, we were just lucky. Sunny attached to us quickly and strongly. His attachment issues are centered around separation and anxiety... not trust and physical closeness. He loves hugs and kisses and tickling and wrestling. He cares deeply about what we think of him. He draws pictures of us together as a happy family, and spontaneously writes notes that say things like "I LOVE YOU MOM AND I HOPE YOU HAVE A GOOD DAY".

I read a lot of blogs by parents who have adopted older children who have not attached so easily. I feel so bad for them (the parents and the kids). It would be such a hard road. I even feel bad writing this post because I don't want to rub it in their faces. But I think this issue sometimes falls under the banner of blog negativity syndrome (people blogging about when things go wrong, but not bothering to blog when things go right) so I just want to add another data point with this post. Sometimes children with a history of inconsistent caregiving in the early years DO NOT have issues with physical closeness and showing affection.

The hard part for us, of course, is dealing with Sunny's fits and rages. When he's trying to bash me in the face, it drains my emotional reservoir very rapidly. But in between fits, it fills up quickly, because he's so loving. If this were not the case, I'd probably be a semi-zombie by now.

We're also lucky that we have such a good relationship with his foster mom, that his foster mom is brilliant, and that his foster mom was Sunny's only placement for almost four years. That made understanding his personality and needs a lot easier as a learning process.

In the above post, I don't think that Claudia is saying that you should let the child do whatever they want, and bribe them, in order to manipulate love. That doesn't work. We started off with pretty strict rules for Sunny, and he still has most of them: for example, I don't know many kids his age who are only allowed to play video games for 15-45 minutes a week. But the rules were a natural continuation of rules he already had in his foster mom's home. I just agree with her totally, based on our experience with Sunny's first year, that the first priority is understanding what behavior can be changed, and what behavior you should just learn to live with somehow because trying to change it is going to make everyone miserable.

I thought we could have family reading nights together. I thought I could help him with his homework. I thought I could easily teach him how to play by himself. I thought we could transition him into waking himself up at night to go to the bathroom. I've had to abandon all these expectations, at least for the short term.

Again, looking back on our first year, I think we're very lucky. I always like to expect the worst, so that I'm pleasantly surprised when the worst doesn't quite happen.

Tuesday, October 06, 2009

Podcast Criticism Response

Here's my response to a comment I just received:

Kathleen said...

Hello, I have been following your blog for quite a while.

I am not surprised, but I am disappointed that this blogcast further stigmatizes international adoptive families.

Not all people who adopt internationally who live in the US are white, nor are they are all American born. Believe it or not, some people who chose to adopt internationally are people who immigrated to the US who were actually born and grew up in the country where they chose to adopt from. Not all people who adopt internationally adopt babies. Some actually adopt older children, sibling groups, and children with special needs and disabilities. Not all people who adopt internationally are elite, rich, entitled white people. Believe it or not, some people who adopt internationally actually have lots of family in the country they adopting from and are very well educated and informed about adoption procedures and are very very careful about avoiding corruption.

I am so tired by how often international adoptive families are clumped together as if they are homogenous.

Hi Kathleen. I don't believe that all international adoption should be stopped, and I have never said that. Neither have I said that all international adoptive parents are white and rich. In fact, I've posted before about problems facing Chinese-American parents adopting from China, and also talked about some research I did about adopting from Japan. And I would adopt from Japan if the conditions for it were better.

Are you sure your reaction isn't a part of something that is being discussed extensively in the Racialicious thread... responding to an institutional critique with an individual defense? It's just a pattern I see a million times when any critique of international adoption comes up.

There are now several blogs by white international adoptive parents that take more critical views of international adoption... they can handle critique of the practice, and even perform their own critique to various degrees, without taking it personally. E.g. chinaadoptiontalk.blogspot.com, thirdmom.blogspot.com, american-family.org.

Honestly, I do not have a huge amount of sympathy for international adoptive parents who are mad about being stigmatized. A small amount, yes, but not a huge amount, because the stigma doesn't really stick all that much. Parents who adopt from foster care have our own, arguably greater issues. Basically, because of international adoptive agency marketing, there's this idea out there that IA is the Cadillac of adoption and foster care is the freaking Yugo. There are ten times more weird myths and misconceptions about foster care adoption than there are about international adoption.

I can't lump together all parents involved in foster care adoption. My opinions exist on a scale. Some of us have opinions against international adoption that are way more negative than mine. Some of us are very pro-IA, and happen to be international adoptive parents as well. What I'm saying is a generalization based on observations in real life and in blogs... it's that many of us seem to have much thicker skin than the average international adoptive parent when it comes to institutional critique.

Is there corruption in the foster care system? Absolutely. I knew that going in.  I will not listen or enter into discussions with extremists who believe that every single removal is unjustified and children should always be left with their biological parents.  But I'll listen to almost any other critique, and look for statistics to back it up, and think hard about it.  Although it's public and state-controlled, there are still plenty of market-type issues in foster care adoption, there's a hierarchy of who is the most desirable child and who is the most desirable parent, and I've talked about those problems also. Many social workers or local systems are full of bias: racial/ethnic bias, bias towards removal, bias against warranted removal.

My problem is that a) the existence of corruption and inequality in international adoption is GREATER b) there is LESS impetus to admit that fact among international adoptive parent communities c) there is GREATER incidence of immediately jumping from "you are judging me and mine" when institutional critique emerges. Why is that? And why is international adoption the "default" in so many environments, even though the national incidence of foster care adoption is 2.5 times higher than international? It should be possible to talk about these questions and try to answer them without activating defense mechanisms.

I agree with you that focusing on elite white IA parents of non-special-needs children makes other types of parents invisible. So how do we help those parents? I have a lot of suggestions for that.

  • Not being defensive about racial discussion so as not to drown out the voices of adoptive parents of color (e.g. Chinese-American adoptive parents). 
  • Supporting adoption reform that encourages training mandates for all international adoptive parents so that they are truly educated about "invisible" special needs such as FAS and RAD.
  • Supporting healthcare reform and mental healthcare parity so that these families can get the treatments they need without becoming bankrupt and falling apart. 
  • Supporting transparency, a greater degree of statistics collection and open records: trying to figure out how high international disruption rates really are, and how many of these kids end up in the foster care system, then trying to figure out how to lower that rate.
  • Until that support is there... not subsidizing these adoptions with tax credits or church grants, so that families don't bring home children without adequate resources in place to treat their special needs.
  • Criticizing narcissistic attention-grubbers like Anita Tedaldi who exploit adoption disruption to sell books and look pretty on TV, when she could have used to the media attention to spotlight the need for support for specific special needs
And these are just things that I believe help families.  There are plenty of other suggestions of reform that are primarily centered on adoptees available at international adoptee blogs. I don't have a good track of recommending these types of reforms myself in communities with a lot of adoptive parents. For example, suggesting that non-Asian families should not be allowed to adopt Asian children unless they live in a demographic circle that has a high enough percentage of Asian-Americans. "That's too hard!" "That's unrealistic!" or "That would lead to more children dying in orphanages!" are the typical responses. Sigh...

I've heard many times about how a particular individual international adoption was justified. I believe my adoption was justified too. But I would never say that I was absolutely, positively, 100% certain of that... I'll quote myself from the Racialicious thread for my reason:

In my own adoption, I talk to my son’s foster mom and biological maternal grandmother every week on the phone. We share language, and a lot of culture. We get along great. My son’s life has been extensively documented and recorded and we have access to those records. And there are still weird mysteries surrounding how my son came into foster care that I don’t think are ever going to be resolved… there are stories that conflict, and relatives bending the truth as they try to present themselves in the best light. When you have this kind of situation in another country, the mysteries can become much deeper. Part of adoption reform means trying to show people that they are NOT certain, that the current standards of diligence are NOT enough, and that we should combat this by demanding open records, transparency and accountability.

I get tired too, of recycling bullet points and argument points and so on... but I've got enough energy to do it here on my own blog.  So I honestly appreciate that you expressed your feelings here without attacking me, and gave  me a good opportunity to respond.  But I'm too tired to actually hang out in larger adoptive parent communities and do this kind of stuff.

Monday, October 05, 2009

Podcast and Update

I was on the Racialicious/Anti-Racist Parent podcast this week!

I loved having the conversation with Carmen and Tami. But I stuttered too much, and compensated with too many "likes" and "you knows". I'm very self-conscious about stuttering. I've had a problem with it since I was a young child. I always try not to use it as an excuse or crutch, so I force myself not to turn down tasks and jobs where I have to speak before groups, like teaching. I usually manage to compensate fairly well. I asked Guy today if he ever notices me stuttering, and he said, "you have a stuttering problem? I never noticed!" It's just so obvious to me whenever I'm in any sort of new situation... sometimes I'm introduced to people, they'll ask me, "what's your name?" and I get stuck for a few seconds in open-mouth-freeze-arrested-head-bob mode and I feel absolutely awful. So I'll pretend I'm distracted by something off in the distance, and once I turn my head back around I'll be ready to actually say my own name. I'm often a worse speaker on the phone than I am in person because I can't use that kind of compensating body language on the phone.

Anyway, enough neuroticism about stuttering. I think the discussion went really well. The main part for me was the transracial/transnational adoption and capitalism topic. I went over some things I'd already outlined in comments on this post. People who read this blog frequently will be pretty familiar with my positions. The other parts of the discussion were also interesting, although I wasn't really prepped for the black Barbie portion, so I feel like I trailed off on a tangent instead of focusing and tying into Tami's analysis.

As for the update, Sunny's behavior was absolutely wretched on Sunday. I think it was mostly fall-out from the flaming pinecone episode. He backtalked all day and had TWO fits. We were really stressed out by the end of it all.

Today, his behavior was a lot better. He had his chess club tonight. Sunny loves this so much that he put a lot of creative thought into getting into the exact right frame of mind to play chess. He started running laps indoors... a circuit at full speed through the hallway, then through the den and kitchen and dining room, into the computer room, jumping onto an ottoman then doing a flying leap back into the hallway, and had me help count off the laps, first in even numbers 2-4-6-8 and then in odd numbers. After about 15 minutes of intense running, leaping and yelling numbers, he was sweaty and out of breath. "I got out my energy so I can focus when I play chess!" he said. This was all his own idea, which is pretty cool. He ended up winning only 1 game out of 3, but since he beat a 13-year-old on the winning game, he was very proud of himself.

Friday, October 02, 2009

The Sordid, Easily-Solved Mystery of the Flaming Pinecones

Driving home from work on a Friday afternoon in Atlanta is always hellish. When I drove into our carport, I was exhausted.

To the right of the carport, on the yard, a feet away from our grill, I noticed two small flaming pinecones.  The weeds around them were also on fire.  Since Dekalb County is now a federally designated flood disaster area, the yard is rather waterlogged, and the flaming areas struck me as extremely unnatural.

My first thought was, "Am I hallucinating?" My second thought was, "what the f*%#ing f#$%!" My third thought was "Is this some weird, miniature woodland elf version of the KKK burning crosses?" My fourth thought was, "the kids must have done this." My fifth thought was, "Is my husband criminally negligent enough to have started this with the kids as some kind of science project?" I was almost totally sure the answer to the last question was "No," but it still crossed my mind.

I yelled for Guy. Then J and Sunny came running around the corner from where they must have been hiding. J was dancing around the pinecones and crying.  "I did a bad thing! Please don't tell my mom! Sunny made me do it!" His shoelaces were getting pretty close to the flaming pinecones, and I yelled at him to move away. Then I put out the fires using a thick, wet doormat.

J is a good kid. He's 10 years old and usually mature for his age.  When Sunny gets frustrated, J often gives him lectures about controlling his temper. His family is strict with him. They're very religious, and his mother is some kind of Baptist deacon. We don't have that much in common with them, unlike our other across-the-street neighbors, but we get along nicely, since our kids are such good friends.

Usually J is a good influence on Sunny. He's calmer than Sunny, and he's older and bigger, so Sunny can't really boss him around. But like Sunny, he's often too smart for his own good. When he sets his mind on doing a bad thing, he carries it out. Now I've discovered that when both of them decide to do bad things, they turn into some kind of freaking supervillain team.

Here's what happened. They were playing inside for a while, but since the weather is nice, Guy told them they had to go play outside. His usual rule, which I agree with, is that unless the weather is nasty, kids should be playing outside before dinner. There were a lot of mosquitoes outside. Instead of dealing with the problem by using the readily available mosquito spray, one of them -- we're not sure which, and we don't really care anymore -- had the bright idea of starting a fire to keep away the mosquitoes. The first thing they did was to douse the pinecones with the lighter fluid next to the grill. Then J asked Sunny where the lighter was. They snuck into the house quietly and Sunny got the lighter from the drawer. Then Sunny gave it to J, then J set the pinecones on fire.

At first, Sunny was screaming that it wasn't his idea, that J did it everything on his own.  Contradictions soon appeared in his version of events, and I told Sunny I didn't believe him. But J wasn't telling the truth either. A 7-year-old "made me do it"... ahem... maybe he was confusing Sunny with, I don't know, SATAN?

Guy took J across the street to face the music with his mother. Sunny started to have a meltdown, so I had to take him inside the house and hold him down for a couple minutes. He screamed and cursed at me but it only took a minute until he became remorseful, began crying and admitted everything. He was sorry for lying, he was acting like an idiot, he always made mistakes... at this point I reminded him he wasn't an idiot, everyone makes mistake and the important thing was to learn from those mistakes. He got a light consequence: grounding from outside play and from TV for the rest of the day. We also told him all the things that could have happened as a result: he could have burned the house down, he could have burned his face off and gone to the hospital, he could have burned to death, he could have burned his friend and felt guilty for the rest of his life, and so on.

As we were eating dinner later this night, Sunny said he had a stomachache.  He barely ate half of his dinner. Sunny usually eats like a horse; I always give him a regular adult-sized portion. Guy put two and two together, made the accusation, and Sunny admitted it... before they snuck into the kitchen to get the lighter, they had also used a step stool to steal from the candy bag in the high cupboard, then gorged themselves on Laffy Taffy.

Before this, Sunny was allowed to have one candy every night from the candy bag as long as he ate all his dinner. The consequence for the theft is pretty simple: we're giving away the candy bag tomorrow. He was really upset about that and spent a few minutes crying for his lost candy.

Honestly, we have to laugh a bit at this whole episode now that the drama has died down. It's like they went on a crime spree.

Guy does think Sunny got off too easily for this. We know that whatever J is facing is going to be much worse. He's probably going to get grounded for a week. I'll check with his mother again tomorrow... I also want to reassure her we're going to keep the lighters and lighter fluid locked up from now on.

I think I'm also going to print out a few clinical pictures of burn victims to show Sunny. But other than that, we're not going to give him any more consequences. He's already remorseful. I'm disappointed in J and Sunny, and I have to revise my estimate of their maturity downwards... but I'm hoping that we've nipped this in the bud.

Comment on Expatriates Post

Here's a comment from Christie that's worth quoting in full:

Nice post... I have to stay away from expat message boards, etc., as they are so poisonous.

One thing I've noticed is that young white men who have been here just a couple of years are often still in the "adventure, interesting!" phase, and the really poisonous & bitter ones are the ones who married Japanese women and settled down here. I think it gets to them being powerless, often not speaking Japanese well, having to take a back seat in the extended family, being the only "foreigner" in the family & having their cultural ways marginalized, etc... and they end up wanting to leave the country, but cannot for whatever reason, leading to a trapped feeling. The bitterness just builds, and they end up seeing problems everywhere and hating their lives here.

My husband is not white, and he is *much* *much* more balanced about the good points vs. bad points of living here as a foreigner. He was often bullied and made to feel like a foreigner when he was growing up in England (his parents are from India). He really likes Japan and doesn't stress about the "oh no I am no longer the center of the world" thing. He is also well accepted and liked in Japan, although he looks middle-Eastern. He has not had any higher level of annoyances than I have (a white woman from the U.S.).

I was sorry to learn that you never have had the opportunity to really feel liked and accepted by Japanese people. I know so many nice people here that I think you would like. Partly though, the region I live in is very laid back and accepting.

My negative experiences have been in Tokyo. I'm not very fond of Tokyo. But I love the countryside, where my father's adoptive family originally lived. Sometime in the future I'd love to experience more diversity in Japan, including Okinawa and Hokkaido.

My feeling on the current state of mixed race or foreign children in Japanese schools is that they can do well in many schools & communities, especially if they are naturally sociable (and can overlook or get past initial comments & the occasional bully). However, if they have socialization issues, etc., then their "foreignness" will be used as yet another thing against them, resulting in a double whammy.

I can imagine that. Also, there seem to be several multiracial Japanese celebrities nowadays. It really sounds like Japan is on the verge of a new paradigm of race and immigration. I've become especially interested in following developments of Nikkeijin organizations. I'm always on the lookout for those types of news sources or blogs in English or Spanish. I ran across a neat documentary recently, though most of it is in Japanese and Portuguese.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Some Thoughts on Racial/Ethnic Hatred Sparked by Expatriates in Japan

Why do some American expatriates in Japan hate the Japanese so much?

If you're not familiar with this hate... it's some of the most virulent hatred I've ever seen in my life. I've witnessed some of it personally, as a bystander, and indirectly heard of much more.

This isn't all expatriates, of course. For example, my mother was an expatriate for a period of time, and she certainly wasn't like that. She has a lot of critical things to say about Japanese culture, but in a balanced way, in much the same proportion as she would criticize any other culture, including her own.

The most vocal expatriates are young white men on stints teaching English, and it's this group that also has the most evil reputation. But other expatriates types also exhibit this hatred sometimes.

Honestly, people like this are one reason I've never seriously considered going to Japan for any length of time longer than a couple weeks. A long time ago, when I was having a rocky time in college, my parents pressured me psychologically into applying for the JET program. I sabotaged my own application so that I could tell them honestly that I was denied. As someone who is not fluent in Japanese, and doesn't really belong to any community in Japan, I knew I would have to be in close contact with this type of expatriate, and I could not stomach the thought of that.

This hatred seems especially disturbing to me because I understand where it comes from. I've been treated badly by Japanese. The first time I was aware of race, and being racially different, was in Japanese kindergarten. In general, Japanese are not particularly friendly to me. To Japanese, I don't look Japanese, I don't dress Japanese, I don't even walk like a Japanese, and in Tokyo, I'm treated with distant politeness or ignored as if I don't exist. My own father sometimes casually insults my identity and accuses me of not being Japanese enough.

As a result, I often don't like Japanese. I enjoy having casual conversations with Japanese tourists in other countries about stuff like food, but I don't purposefully seek them out or go looking for deeper friendships with them. There are some exceptions, like my roommate in Mexico that I felt very close to. He was considering immigrating permanently to Mexico, and had different ideas about identity than the vast majority of Japanese.

But I don't hate Japanese. Based on my personal history I have some hang-ups and neuroticisms about Japanese that I wish I didn't have, but I do, so I compensate in practical ways. Otherwise, I just think of Japanese as human beings... flawed, complicated human beings, like all other groups of human beings.

I'm not going to provide lists and examples of bad expat behavior. You're either familiar with it or you're not, and if you're not, then you're lucky. But here's the basic arc:

Stage 1: I love Japan. Japan is so cool. It's so different over here. I can't wait to meet some samurai and geisha. I'm fulfilling my lifelong dream. This is going to be awesome.
Stage 2: Japan isn't what I thought, but it's still really cool. All these Japanese girls are having sex with me just because I'm an American. Sometimes I get the feeling people are looking down on me. Oh well, if I just smile a lot and speak Japanese better, I'm sure they'll accept me.
Stage 3: Culture shock, aching loneliness and deep depression
Stage 4: Retreating and retrenching in a safe womb-like environment with other expats
Stage 5: F%#@ these racist, xenophobic Japanese. Japanese women are manipulative stuck-up $%!@s. I wish we'd bombed ALL of Japan. I'm rude to them all the time now so I can get back at them for treating me like they do. And I can't wait to get home.
Stage 6: Now that I'm home, the bad memories of Japan are fading a bit, thank goodness. I have returned a much wiser person. I know all the weak spots of the Japanese now. In fact, I'm an expert on Asian culture. I explained this to an Asian-American once but they violently disagreed with me. Oh well, they're not a real Asian anyway.
(Alternate Stage: Stay in Japan, let hatred die down to a bilious rumbling with occasional explosions.  Post regularly on f*ckedgaijin.com).

Sexuality and misogyny and the legacy of imperialism are big parts of all of this. Imagine the expat arc as a dysfunctional romance, with Japan as the woman, and you could encapsulate most of those stages in the immortal words of Marion Barry: "Bitch set me up!"

The sex/imperialism is also an angle that's been covered by theorists quite extensively. I'd like to approach the issue from another angle, a more comparative and personal one, based on my experiences with born citizens and immigrants as well as expatriates.

Have I ever encountered the same level of hatred toward Americans? No, but I came close, once in Mexico, and once in the U.S.

When I was in Mexico, I met a lot of people who criticized the U.S. I largely agreed with the criticisms, and they were stated in a fair way. In fact, Mexican leftists who had problems with U.S. politics were always MORE charitable than U.S. leftists. They would often talk about aspects of the U.S. that they admired, such as our history of relatively fair elections. I never saw this criticism spill over into hate, though.

I also met a lot of Mexicans who were treated very badly in the U.S. and still didn't develop hatred. For example, I met a taxi driver in Guadalajara who told me that he risked his life to cross the desert to find work in Dallas, but the people there were so racist and unfriendly, it took him only three weeks to decide to go right back to Guadalajara. Maybe they're nicer in other parts of the U.S., he noted optimistically, though he had no further plans to ever leave Mexico again. Another Mexican I met spent six years in prison in Florida for a crime he claimed he didn't commit, and he still had a lot of good things to say about the U.S.

And I don't think that people leashed any hatred simply because they didn't want to offend me, an American tourist. If I was white, I might think that. But Mexicans often find it hard to believe I'm an American, even after I state it quite clearly. I don't "look American". It's a reaction I encounter frequently anywhere outside the U.S., and I've developed a pretty thick skin about it.

Anyway, one night while I was traveling in Mexico by myself, I ended up in a crowded taxicab going to a nightclub. Since we had to go a long way on a dirt road, and most of my fellow taxi goers had already had a few drinks, the conversation was heated and lively. There were a couple Mexicans and an Austrian tourist. The Austrian tourist, on hearing I was American, launched into a diatribe against American cultural imperialism. We made crappy movies, and crappy music, and crappy food, our American crap was drowning out everyone else's culture, all our entertainment was vulgar, and so on.

I got angry. I was prepared to hear this sort of thing from a Mexican, but not from an Austrian. Most Europeans have enough money and power to consume their own crap if they want; they happen to CHOOSE to consume ours. I tried to argue back, but he kept interrupting me. So I dropped the bomb. "Well what's your native way of having fun on the weekend in Austria? Burning Jews?" The Mexicans all gasped. The Austrian visibly wilted, and said in a small voice, "that was a long time ago". The conversation shifted. We'd put on a good show for the Mexicans, though: they looked like they were really enjoying the argument from the sidelines.

To this day I feel a little bad for cutting down the Austrian like that. But only a little.

Although I said I was prepared to hear this kind of diatribe from a Mexican, I never did. My overall impression was that Mexicans were rather light on the criticism when it came to the U.S. For every thing they hated, they knew something that they loved. Sadness, disappointment, anxiety, yes; hatred, no.

When I lived in Miami, I worked in a series of restaurants and bars. There was an informal but very powerful racial/ethnic hierarchy pretty much everywhere I worked in the service industry. White Anglos, upper-class Cuban-Americans and diverse upper-class immigrants/expatriates (usually European) were at the top. They were the owners and managers. The middle was composed of more Cuban-Americans and Anglos. Halfway between the middle and bottom were native African-Americans and whiter-looking Latinos. On the very bottom, recently arrived Carribean black people (Haitian, Jamaican) and other Latinos (such as Central Americans). Your place in the hierarchy was determined by 1) money 2) degree of whiteness 3) degree of blackness 4) kind of English spoken 5) kind of Spanish spoken 6) citizenship and documentation status. Since Miami is such a diverse and chaotic environment, new arrivals often weren't quite sure where they fit in the hierarchy. I know I was never sure, myself.

One day, I was outside my restaurant having a smoke break with the Jamaican janitor/busser. We struck up a conversation that quickly took a disturbing turn. She started on a rant about how the American black people were all thieves, liars, drug abusers, could not be trusted, made her people look bad, and so on. I just told her I didn't think that was a fair thing to say, but I didn't want to get in an argument with her. I felt sorry for her because she was facing a horrendous level of racism from the manager, a white Frenchman who was racist against everyone who worked there, but picked on her the most.

I wondered later, why did she hate African-Americans so much? Why not hate white people or white Europeans? After all, the manager truly was an evil worm of a person (full story of his evilness here).

One reason is that it's not very common to hate upwards. It's more common to fear the people who have power over you. If you can't separate from those people (people with separatist ideologies can hate in any direction), you have to learn how to get along with them.  And you don't have the energy to spare for hate.

When I was dealing with racist abuse in school in the U.S., I felt the same way. I didn't have time to hate the people who abused me. All my emotional energy was wrapped up in trying to answer two questions: "Why are they doing this to me?" and "How can I make them stop?" In order to try and stop the abuse I had to think like my abusers, I had to put myself in their shoes, I had to imagine how they saw me, I had to imagine how they would react if I did certain things as opposed to doing other things.

I could not afford to hate them.

I think it's much more common to hate downwards. And a subset of hating downwards is hating sideways. My Jamaican coworker was financially on a lower level of the hierarchy than African-Americans, but she also realized she was on a higher level when it came to stereotypes of morality and culture. That is, she observed that there were more negative sentiments against African-Americans than there were against Jamaicans. So hating African-Americans was a way to claim a higher position in the hierarchy, a way to claim that no, she was not on the same level or lower, she was really on a higher level.

Whenever someone is insecure about their position in a hierarchy, a way to stabilize your position is 1) find someone who is on the same level or slightly lower 2) hate them.

I think this works in the area of class, as well. Often, the people who say they hate the poor the most are the people who have escaped poverty, or who are lower-middle-class and almost in poverty. Really rich people rarely hate the poor. They can ignore them and/or exploit them without going through the bother of hating them.

An expatriate in Japan, once they hit the culture shock stage, becomes incredibly confused about their place in the hierarchy. This confusion is compounded by the fact that they don't even understand, on a visceral level, that the hierarchy even exists. The ideal of egalitarianism is very strong in the U.S. When that egalitarianism actually works, I love it. It's what makes my country great. But it's an ideal, not a reality. If you believe it's already a reality, you become blind to the existence of totally real hierarchies lying underneath the mask of egalitarianism.

People from countries with more formalized race, caste and/or class systems have more experience, more cynicism and more ability to notice parallel structures in foreign countries. They'll have a more practical attitude. "OK, I've landed. Where am I? Near the bottom... darn. Can I work my way up? Oh, it looks like this system is really rigid. Only a few rungs? What about my kids? Well, I'll adjust my expectations and see if it's worth the trade-off."

The Japan-hating expatriate has huge privilege from being some combination of white, American and male. Japanese give them a lot of room. When they act badly, Japanese will simply ignore it. The expatriate senses weakness. "They let me get away with bad behavior - that means I am better and stronger than them - I hate them because I am better than them - I am better than them because I hate them." But the expatriate also starts to understand that the Japanese don't really need them. Japan is pretty much the richest non-white country in the world when it comes to economic power and median living standards. The expatriate may start penning angry rants about Japan, but there is nothing they can really do to get any kind of meaningful revenge in a collective sense. Though they can be very cruel to individual Japanese, and then later, to Asian-Americans.

They realize the sheer uselessness of their hate, and it makes them hate even more.

I wish I had a better note on which to end this piece! 

Friday, September 25, 2009

When Children Die

This is going to be a very heavy post.  I'm not going to write much myself, or talk about my connections to the subject, because it affects me too much emotionally at the present time.  Instead, I'm going to leave several quotes.

From CNN: Mother recalls night flood changed everything
September 23, 2009

[...]

The force of the water slammed Bridgett into a tree. The 24-year-old mother fought to straddle a branch and wrap her right arm around another one -- the left held the 30-pound boy tight to her. She yelled for Craig, who called back from another tree.

"Where's Slade at?" she hollered.

From the darkness, and above the roar of water and rain, she heard her 26-year-old husband respond: "Baby, I don't know. I lost him."

He had slipped through his arms after they'd jumped. An 18-foot wall of water hit them both.

Over and over, Bridgett screamed her son's name.


Preston Slade Crawford
December 12, 2006 - September 21, 2009
Master Preston Slade Crawford, age 2 of Horsley Mill Rd., Carrollton, passed away Monday, September 21, 2009. He was born December 12, 2006 in Carroll County, Georgia the son of Bridgett Danielle Lawrence Crawford and Jerry Craig Crawford, Jr. Besides his parents, Slade is survived by a brother, Cooper Gunner Crawford; paternal grandparents, J.C. & Pat Crawford of Carrollton; maternal grandparents, Glenda & Royce Rowland of Augusta. Funeral services will be conducted Friday, September 25, 2009 from Martin & Hightower Heritage Chapel with Rev. Joey Dedman and Dr. Steve Davis officiating. Interment will follow in Carroll Memory Gardens. The family will receive friends at the funeral home Thursday from 5 PM until 8 PM. In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions may be made to First National Bank of Georgia, Donations for Slade Crawford, 201 Maple St., Carrollton, Ga., 30117. The family will like to extend their sincere appreciation to Carroll County Fire & Rescue, Carroll County Sheriff’s Office, the many volunteers, Department of Natural Resources, Carroll EMC, Georgia Forestry, Carrollton City Fire Department, Carrollton City Police Department and Carroll County Inmates. Messages of condolences may be sent to the family at www.martin-hightower.com. Martin & Hightower Heritage Chapel of Carrollton has charge of the arrangements.

The passage below connects me to my religion, and also to the history of my father, who as a baby also came very close to death in postwar Japan.

From Toshikazu Arai's blog, Echoes of the Name: Dharma Talk at Fraser Valley Buddhist Temple


As we live our life, we meet new people and part with old acquaintances. Meeting and getting acquainted with new people is usually a happy occasion, but parting brings sadness. Especially parting with loved ones by death gives us a great pain. My parents died more than twenty years ago, but even now, I sometimes feel as if they were sleeping in the next room when I am not fully awake in the morning. Then I realize that I am a fatherless and motherless child, all alone in the world. It might be that by departing from this world, they made me truly stand up on my two feet.

People often say someone had a long life or another one had a short life. However, there is no saying which person's life is more valuable. What is important is what meaning the person's life has had to "me." Each person comes to this world with certain tasks to perform and depart after fulfilling them. Even the life of a baby who has died a few days after birth has a meaning. For example, the little boy who Kisa Gotami gave birth to and died at about four acted as a Bodhisattva for her by guiding her to the Buddha Dharma. I used to have a sister who died at one and a half years old just after World War II. I was wondering what was the meaning of her life, now that I am the only person who remembers her in the world. I realize that by departing from this world, she gave me what would have become her food in order to let me survive the poverty and sever lack of food just after the war. Because I have been able to live, I have had the fortune to meet the Dharma. If I attain birth in the Pure Land, she would certainly welcome me there with joy.

I don't believe in fate, but I do believe in meaning.

Another Visit?

We were initially planning on visiting Sunny's home state once a year.  This year, we already went in March.  However, I'm thinking of going again for Halloween.  Sunny always talks about how awesome Halloween is with his foster family and all the fun stuff they would do, so it would be a wonderful treat for him. 

A major negative would be the expense of the visit, especially since we just had some minor flood damage and I still don't know how much that's going to cost to renovate.  Then, another positive AND negative to the potential visit would be the fact of seeing BB.  The situation with BB has become increasingly painful for me.  I'm at the point where I dread seeing pictures of him.  My stepfather was recently able to visit the foster family as a side trip from his business trip, and he's about to send a bunch of pictures he took... he told me BB has curly blond hair starting growing on his head now.  Honestly, I felt the news like a slap in the face from nowhere.  I just want to crawl into a hole and wait for news that 1) BB is coming to live with us 2) he's going to stay there, maybe adopted by Sunny's foster mom.  I would make it through either way, but I can't stand this waiting around.

He's getting older and older and more at risk for attachment issues when/if the move does happen.  The only reason I know of that they haven't placed him with us is that the state has a budget crisis (like all states nowadays) and his case doesn't have high priority.  He has a great placement, nobody is arguing about where he needs to go, so what's the rush?  That's how they must think.

I would like to see BB, but I also don't want to see him. I don't want to see him grown up so much and think that for the last 13 months he should have been living with us and taking his first steps with us and saying his first words with us.

I need to put on my big girl panties and just look at the pictures and try to be happy.  

Monday, September 21, 2009

Atlanta Flooding

Four people dead so far. This is terrible!

My mother just sent me this picture she took.


Sunday, September 20, 2009

Chinese Adoption Corruption and Maddening Stereotypes in the Media

These last few weeks there have been a flurry of large media stories covering major corruption in international adoption. Guatemala. Guatemala again. Ethiopia. Now China.

I hope this new exposure will eventually lead to some serious reforms.

It's not like there aren't ethical minefields in foster care adoption... but at least families have some degree of insight into the problems. When I have questions, I can pick up the phone and talk to everyone involved. Problems in international adoption are ten times worse, and they're also ten times less transparent. You're dealing with foreign legal systems, foreign languages, foreign cultures. International adoptive parents who shrug off these corruption stories by saying "well it doesn't apply to my case" usually have no evidence whatsoever. They just don't know at all and likely never will.

There are exceptions. International adoptive parents may or may not face the same knowledge barriers (e.g. some Chinese-Americans adopting from China).  Or they're adopting older children and/or are in touch with their childrens' biological families.  In fact, that's how I think a lot of these corruption cases have come to light: older adopted children tell their new parents that the agency's story is a lie, and the new parents have enough integrity to believe them and investigate further.

Anyway, I think the fact that these corruption cases are being discussed in the mainstream media is a good step. However, I still have major issues with the way they're being framed. The LA Times China article has two major failings: 1) it doesn't include the adoptee viewpoint and 2) it fails to challenge stereotypical thinking about China.

How hard would it have been for the reporter to ask an adoptee for their perspective?  The same reporter, Barbara Demick, wrote an article several weeks ago --
Adopted teen finds answers, mystery in China -- about a teenager who had a reunion with his birth family in China. Why not include a few sentences of his reaction to the story? Instead, the American perspectives are all from adoptive parents. And this includes one randomly chosen adoptive mother who is pretty much the living embodiment of cluelessness.

She wonders what she would do if she discovered that her daughter was one of the stolen babies. She knows she could never return the Americanized 6-year-old, who is obsessed with "SpongeBob" and hates the Chinese culture classes her mother enrolled her in. But she said, "I would certainly want to tell the birth family that your daughter is alive and happy and maybe send a picture."

"It would be up to my daughter later if she wanted to build a relationship," she said.

Shades of the Anna Mae He coverage I complained about last year.  There are so many things wrong in this paragraph. It presumes being Chinese as somehow incompatible with being American, ignoring the existence of 3.5 million Chinese-Americans who have somehow managed to pull off this incredible feat.

And SpongeBob obsession is supposedly total proof of being American. They don't watch Sponge Bob in China... actually, let me confirm that by doing a few seconds of searching on Google.

Variety: China sponges 'SpongeBob'
Cartoon sweeps ratings on CCTV
"SpongeBob SquarePants" has swept to the top of the ratings on Chinese state broadcaster CCTV's Kids Channel. The quirky toon has become the most popular children's show in 15 key cities, drawing viewership of 20.5 million to Bikini Bottom.

Oops!

And I won't get into that "because she doesn't like Chinese culture classes that lets me off the hook for everything" implication. This is an extremely complicated issue (see a great blog post on it here).

Leaving reunion totally up to the child is also a cop-out. There are many complicated steps that need to be taken as soon as possible in order to maintain relationships. Waiting until it's no longer your responsibility means removing choice from the child, not giving them more choice.

I can't stand this woman's attitude and what it represents about international adoption. It's so selfish and ignorant. If this were me, I would feel morally obligated to do a lot more than maybe send a picture.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Meltdown Post-Mortem, 504 Post-Mortem

Sunny had a major meltdown last night. It's the first violent fit Sunny has had in almost three weeks. I suppose that's good and bad at the same time... they were happening several times a week earlier this year.

I could almost see it coming. NN and Sunny had some alone time yesterday for the first time in the visit. She took him to the toy store and bought him a ton of toys. Then they went back to her hotel room for a bit and they played Pokemon while watching a Lego movie, then they met us for dinner and he came home with us afterwards.

He was getting into overstimulation mode... overstimulated with toys and overstimulated with emotions. At bedtime, it all spilled over. I had to restrain him for a combined time of about 20 minutes.

This time Guy stayed away. He has a tendency to get really mad when he hears Sunny cursing at me, and then says unhelpful things, such as "you're acting like a baby".

One of the things Sunny said tonight was that he wasn't happy about people at school calling him a baby. I'm not surprised that happens. We talked with his second-grade teacher at the 504 meeting the other day about how emotional Sunny gets in the classroom. Sometimes, when the teacher tells him to move his seat or tells him he can't do something, he'll start crying, and throw himself on the floor. Or he might sit down, sulk, and make handgun/lasergun shooting motions at the whole classroom.

I mentioned to the teacher that Sunny is manipulating to get attention when he does things like throw himself on the floor. Since she can't just ignore the behavior like we do (it distracts the whole class), the best strategy is to reward him for the absence of negative behavior, e.g. "you responded nicely when I said 'no', good for you, here's your 'right response' sticker!". We talked to Sunny later about the shooting stuff, and told him it was absolutely unacceptable to do that in class. Play-shooting is for playgrounds, not for classrooms. We'll have to monitor that behavior pretty closely and stay in touch with his teacher about it.

His teacher also told us about one really charming episode. The whole class have portable dividers made from laminated file folders that they can use when they need extra privacy for schoolwork. There was a class discussion about distractions, and Sunny reminded everyone not to distract him when he had his folder up. He said, "Sometimes it's hard for me not to get distracted. Because I have TWENTY things going on in my head at the same time! I want to focus and do my work right but it's hard for me!"

That was very touching to hear. He's so smart and self-aware.

After the meltdown last night he was remorseful, of course. I reminded him that this visit is a difficult time because it brings up happy things and sad things from the past, all mixed together. I told him he was like a ship sailing on the sea and the sea was a little stormy right now, but he could get control and make his way through the storm.

NN is in town for two more days. Tonight we'll do some sort of combined activity, then maybe on Saturday they can go to an indoor event together.

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Hilarious for Locals

The city-data.com forums are great if you want unvarnished information about any geographic area. Of course, mixed in with that, you will also get unvarnished racism and unvarnished stupidity.

SouthernExplorer
Junior Member
Looking for majority white areas of the Metro
I am from New Orleans, and my wife is from Memphis. After we got married, we tried living in New Orleans. It was ok until Katrina hit, and it became too ghetto and distressed. We then moved to Memphis, and we just did not like being white minorities. We want to stay in the south, close to Memphis and NOLA but want a big city feel. Atlanta fits the bill.

We just want to be in an area with our own kind. Moderator cut: Please no stereotyping individual races.

So, as we look to move to Atlanta, we want a majority white area. Ill be working in Midtown, and my wife is getting a job in Sandy Springs. Our price range is a maximum of $550,000. I do not mind a long commute. Thanks!

gt6974a
Senior Member
1 post huh? In that case, I'd say the Bankhead area b/t 285 and downtown. Most of the affluent live there.

SouthernExplorer
Junior Member
Great, thanks so much for your reply. Do you know the name of some of the subdivisions in that area that would be in our price range?

skipcromer
Senior Member
I second! Bankhead would be perfect.


Bankhead is.... not a serious recommendation.  But the poster did end up getting a lot of really serious recommendations. This  great explanation was given for complying with his request:

RoslynHolcomb
Senior Member
Personally I'm delighted to help these type people find that which they seek. Goodness knows I don't want them living anywhere near me or mine.

The poster is so archetypal of the plight of the Southern upper-middle-class white flighter.  Can't live in the country because they loathe lower-class white people.  The Southern cities are full of black people.  Can't move out of the South because the Yankees might look down on them.  And nowadays... can't live in the dying exurbs because they're filling up with Latinos and other immigrants.

He will eventually retire to South Carolina.  But even there, he will die frustrated.

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Sunny Calmed Down Yesterday

We had a visit break yesterday. We were planning on taking Sunny over to NN's hotel after his gym class, but NN's ankle injury was acting up and it was rainy and we just decided to get together tonight instead, at my mother's. They'll be here until the end of the weekend.

I think this break worked well for Sunny. He was pretty calm yesterday and got all of his stars for good behavior.

At this point, Sunny hasn't had a hitting episode in more than two weeks. He did have a major screaming meltdown last week in the car with Guy, but it didn't involve hitting. I've had to restrain him a couple times since then, but each time I was able to let him back up within seconds.

If this keeps up and maintains for a while, I guess we can start thinking about taking him off medication entirely. The new psychiatrist we saw last month had us do something very smart: get a blood test to make sure the medication wasn't creating any long-term chemical imbalances. They said it would be important to establish a baseline before doing any kind of change. We have a follow-up appointment in October.

I would also be open to a medication change as long as it was a medication with less potential side effects than the one he's currently on. He's never had any side effects yet, but I'm still worried.

I don't think a specifically ADHD drug would help. Sunny's foster mom said that their psychiatrist had already tried him on Adderall... and it greatly improved his school performance, but also made him "mean" and unhappy. I'll take his current average-with-supports school performance over that scenario. The thought of medicating away Sunny's naturally joyful personality is horrifying.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Celebrity ADHD?

I thought I had absolutely no interest in blogging about Kanye West, who seems to be the number one topic of conversation in the blogosphere over the last few days.  I don't have TV, much less cable, and haven't watched MTV in decades.  One celebrity was mean to another celebrity because they got an award they thought should have gone to yet another celebrity... yawn.  I'm usually interested in looking at any kind of racial analysis in the media but I care so little about the celebrities involved that I didn't muster up the energy in this case.

Then I read this post at the Republic of T that casts the episode in a different light...

In fact, four of the five most common social problems experienced by kids with ADD/ADHD could easily apply to West.
* Interrupting others – One of the primary symptoms associated with ADHD is impulsivity. The uncontrollable urge to speak makes it hard to listen. Additionally, kids with ADHD have difficulty focusing on one thought for very long, therefore getting their thought out may be more important than joining in the rhythm of the conversation.
* Failure to understand others anger – Kids with ADHD don’t perceive their inconsiderate actions as rude. They may not be able to understand why the schoolmate they interrupted 10 times in a five minute conversation was angry. After all what’s wrong with joining in on the conversation.
* Being Perceived as Self Centered – Self centeredness can be a serious problems both for kids and adults. The ADHD personality may come across as one that doesn’t understand the feelings or needs of others. If this trait is carried forward into adulthood it can be very problematic in personal relationships. For kid with ADHD it often causes problems with schoolmates, parents, and teachers.
* Not respecting others space – Little Johnny sat behind Sara in class. He continually bumps her chair and when no one is looking pulls her hair. Little Johnny doesn’t understand why he keeps getting in trouble, after all he likes little Sara. Kids with ADHD struggle with the concept of personal space. When you combine the disregard for others personal space with ADHD symptoms such as hyperactivity and inattention, classmate Sara should ask for a different seat assignment immediately!
* Poor sportsmanship – One of the common traits of ADHD children is becoming easily frustrated. Frustration can spill over into other activities such as sports; leading kids with ADHD to cheat if they fall behind and throw temper tantrums if the outcome isn’t acceptable. Often poor losers have trouble finding others to interact with socially thus adding to their already unpredictable behavior.
And in West’s behavior, I recognize at least one symptom of ADD/ADHD.
Blurt out inappropriate comments, show their emotions without restraint, and act without regard for consequence

I have mixed feelings about using ADHD as a label. I think it's used too often to label and limit kids. But there's also power (for the good) in understanding the way they think and benefiting from the experience of others with similar conditions.

All the above behaviors also apply to Sunny. I do think he has ADHD. After talking with NN, I think it runs in his maternal family, just like it runs in mine.  As I've often said, I don't think Sunny's ADHD is as severe as my cousin's or my uncle's. ADHD is just a bracketed subset along a mental spectrum. Sunny has a lot of problems with interrupting, personal space issues and so on, but he can function in a normal classroom with a fairly light set of 504-plan accommodations.

I almost hate to say it, but Sunny's personality seems rather Kanye-ish. He has a strong and very rigid sense of fairness. He interrupts others and speaks loudly. He expresses whatever he feels at any given moment, whether it's love, sadness or anger. He has a huge amount of confidence and thinks he's great at everything. He's very popular with other kids, but they also get mad at him at all the time. Sunny's ten-year-old friend often gives him lectures about his behavior! If he had a blog it would probably be in all capital letters.

This is not to say that he's helpless to change the more negative aspects of his behavior. We work on sportsmanship all the time and we've made some decent progress. He's capable of good sportsmanship, it's just more difficult for him than for the average child.

I agree with the blogger Terrance that if Kanye has ADD/ADHD, it isn't an excuse. He was still acting like a jackass (as Obama said). Or maybe he was drunk. Likely it was all three at the same time: he was being a drunk jackass with ADD/ADHD.

Terrance, who has ADD, offered this piece of advice for challenging situations based on his own experience. It's one I'm going to keep in mind for Sunny.

My strategy, for those times, is to fall back on a rule I taught myself years ago: “If I don’t say anything, I can’t say the wrong thing. If I don’t do anything, I can’t do anything wrong.”

And I almost forgot, my stepfather was diagnosed a few years ago (in his late fifties) with ADD plus PTSD.  He has horrendously bad impulse control.  I love him, but he's totally helpless in many ways and if it wasn't for my mother he'd probably be sleeping in a ditch somewhere.  Medication (a varying combination of Ritalin, Wellbutrin and Lexapro) has vastly improved his quality of life.  He had to discontinue the Ritalin for a while because of his Hepatitis C, but he wants to get back on it.